START WITH ANORO VS STIOLTO

In a single, 8-week, open-label study, ANORO demonstrated statistically significant improvement in lung function vs STIOLTO1

Primary endpoint: change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 81*

LS MEAN CHANGE FROM BASELINE IN TROUGH FEV1 (mL)

A replicate study has not been conducted.

*Results shown for the ITT population. Similar results were observed in the PP population where treatment with ANORO (n=202) demonstrated noninferiority to STIOLTO (n=192) on the primary endpoint of change from baseline in trough FEV1 at Week 8 (175 mL vs 122 mL; 53-mL difference; 95% CI: 26, 80; P<0.001).1

Description of study1
The efficacy and safety of ANORO ELLIPTA (administered as 1 inhalation once daily) and STIOLTO RESPIMAT (tiotropium bromide & olodaterol) inhalation spray (administered as 2 inhalations once daily) were evaluated in an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, two-period crossover (3-week washout between the two periods), open-label study in symptomatic patients (mean age: 64.4) with moderate COPD. At screening, patients had a mean postbronchodilator FEV1 of 59.6% predicted.
Primary endpoint
Change from baseline in trough predose FEV1 at week 8.
Statistical analysis
If noninferiority of ANORO to STIOLTO was demonstrated in the PP population (N=227) (i.e., if the lower boundary of the 95% CI for the treatment difference was greater than -50 mL), statistical superiority was then investigated in the ITT population (N=236). ANORO would be considered to have efficacy superior to STIOLTO on the primary endpoint if the lower boundary of the 95% CI of the treatment difference was greater than 0 mL.

Adverse events occurring in ≥3% of patients in the 8-week, open-label study1

Adverse Events

ANORO

(n=235)

STIOLTO

(n=230)

Viral upper respiratory tract infection 5% 6%
Upper respiratory tract infection 3% 3%

Safety data are descriptive only. The study was not powered to compare the safety profiles of the products.

24-Week, pivotal, placebo-controlled study2

A separate, 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ANORO (n=413), placebo (n=280), and other treatment arms, each administered once daily in patients with moderate or worse COPD. For the primary endpoint, ANORO improved trough FEV1 by 167 mL vs placebo (171 mL vs 4 mL, respectively) at Day 169 (P<0.001).